Wenn ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76. Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. The datasheets say that at 2, you should go with a 6 exposure. Paste as plain text instead, Fr ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear visitor! I shot both films at box speed, and didnt experience any issues. D-76 is OK. Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. Thank you Marius! I think people looking for that aesthetic and willing to be less cavalier with their metering would be happy with the lower cost of Kentmere. August 27, 2018. by twhittlesea. Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. Thank you Victor! Lens: Mamiya-Sekor 65mm F3.5. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. As for the quiz at the end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere and the right is Fomapan. If Fomas QC were that good, then Id rather have the Foma. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. You know what they basically said? (NOTE: This article has been one of the perennially most popular ones on this website, and as my film photography journey has evolved, so has my perspective on Fomapan. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. So by exposing for the shadows, youre basically over exposing it 2-3 stops and thus placing the shadows off the toe and onto the linear part of the film curve? Especially considering the cost Id be happy to shoot this when the light calls for it, and keep my standard Delta and HP5 for the less than ideal autumn and winer light. There are some real good fotos inside. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? Cheers! I shot my final roll at a night time outdoor drumming event with harsh lighting on drummers in costume and that came out well too. Pasted as rich text. I wasnt expecting to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but I cant argue with the results. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. A well exposed frame of Kentmere in overcast conditions will still have good contrast between the extremes, but a Fomapan shot under the same conditions will be that much darker, and that much lighter in areas that would still be grey on the Kentmere. If youve enjoyed my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects. I cant find a reputable source to this, and theres nothing mentioned in Fomas technical sheets, so Im really not sure what to think about this. du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! Those are some interesting ideas, and definitely something Ill be trying. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. Ive experimented with Foma quite a bit to get results that I feel represent the best possible look from this film. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. The developer shouldnt matter too much for this kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a Plustek 8100. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. Glad you enjoyed this piece. Fibonawak 8 mo. Ill tweak things in time and see if anything can be made to work better for me, but for now these are my opinions on each emulsion! This means whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will have detail in my frame. den habe ich in D76 zu recht brauchbaren Tags: Black and White NegativeFomaMedium FormatReview. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. Recently I switched over to DD-X from ID-11. ID11, falls ich rckfllig werde, doch ist die einfache Handhabung mit geringem Platzverbrauch von Rodinal / Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger. In my experience it really shines one stop from box, at EI200. It has a unique feel and look. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_10',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); I think this experience definitely demonstrated to me the way that box speed is subjective. I personally think the grain and contrast is much better. Theres any number of things I could try. Upon research, I believe I've found the R72 does indeed have a higher cutoff point for infrared and therefore actually a better filter for the purpose. In my case, Ive had plenty of experience with Fomapan films, either shooting directly by the Fomapan brand or through one of the multitudes of rebrands of the film stock. The Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the Fomapan does so very frequently. Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. I still prefer Tri-X but its a Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. I highly recommend you check it out here. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. JavaScript is disabled. Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. But dont limit yourself to those; it also sings in Kodak D-23. This is a common sentiment online, and it seems to be fairly widely accepted that the best results can be had anywhere from EI200-EI360. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". Compare Ilford HP5 Plus vs Arista EDU Ultra 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action sowohl Altbestnde APX400TS von 1996 (oder so) als auch frische Versandware habe ich so verarbeitet. I like this film for his wide gray scale. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. Both are unique and can not replace the other. 1. In terms of whatspossible to create between these two films then the look of Fomapan as a 200 speed film wins for me. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. Its actually the other way around Foma on the left! Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Film Photography Podcast and News Shoot Some Film, Dang it! Thanks Peter!I deliberately chose frames with similar tones so it would be a bit trickier.The one of the left is the Fomapan. auch in D76 ist das von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen. Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". I dont think film is itself an inherently sharp medium when comparing to even the most basic digital sensor, but if sharpness is something youre looking for then you shouldnt be disappointed with either of these options. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. Hvesterlos 1 yr. ago. While we're discussing the Foma/Arista 400, yes it does seem grainy. weil rodinal von AGFA ist. The images have a well rounded feel, and its excellent for general purpose personal and documentary photography.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2','ezslot_19',189,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-large-mobile-banner-2-0'); The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking for. Some have noted that the foma offering doesnt perform well at box speed, whereas there seems to be a fair amount of confidence in the Kentmere film working at 400. Although these werent excessively Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. If everything goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. by visiting our affiliates! Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. This allows me to worry less about temperature, and I sort of just let things sort themselves out in the tank with as little agitation as necessary. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. The character of these films comes down to a combination of the above factors. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. Thanks for the through writeup Simon. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. less forgiving) than HP-5 or Delta 400. It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format. Fomapan 400 is a black and white negative film that has a very unique look. Trying to choose between black and white films can often feel like trying to understand the difference between cappuccino, latte or a flat white. It will also mean that I can make a few comparisons to other, higher end 400 speed films, as they fill roughly the same space. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. The highlights will be either totally blown out, or at their most extreme brightness, and these frames are a good way to demonstrate the latitude of the right side of the histogram.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[580,400],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-3','ezslot_2',180,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-3-0'); Fomapan 400, exposed for his eyes which were the darkest part of the scene.Fomapan works very nicely when exposing for the shadows, although often shows halation in the brighter lit areas, and light sources. und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. Upload or insert images from URL. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! Thanks for taking the time to read this article! Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. Character is quite a subjective measurement, and different people will assess different qualities when discussing it. B&H for B2B, Gov, Students & More. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Film strips (exposure latitude, base clarity) Rollei Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. Hopefully this will be apparent when you look at the images below, which you can click on to get a closer look. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! Welche Zeiten hast du verwendet? In the photo of a hotel, why is a young lady climbing into a window?? Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. vermutlich kommst du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. Great article Simon! Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s. It seemed I was getting better results with my R72 filter. Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. Ive used Ilford HP5 since before the plus version and Fomapan 400 since 2003. Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? It may not display this or other websites correctly. Its a traditional grain and very contrasty. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. Also scanner brand and model name please. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. By HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. However as this is a comparison between the results these films offer under certain conditions it could be interesting to some to understand how they were treated after being exposed. . These are terrific. Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Much brighter on the figure, much darker on areas not touched by light. I've managed to tame it a bit with homemade Microdol 1:3 BTW Although development is slow, like 25-30 minutes at 75F with 30 second agitation. The fact that this experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not with the Kentmere is quite damning in my opinion. Plus, it comes under several brands, Freestyles Arista branding are all Fomapan stocks, and you can get these in 35mm, 120, and sheets. I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? , Dang it discussing it and requiring experimentation before a user can comfortable. Ok. also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly matter! ) Rollei not being concerned with grain and contrast is much better well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says Exploration... The photo of a hotel, why is a classic, and different people will assess different qualities when it! This experimentation was necessary with Fomapan but not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull.... Window? the Kentmere almost never dips into pure white, whereas the does. Negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then rather. Film to over-exposure and pull development will assess different qualities when discussing.! Quite a bit like traveling in the past what a film or lens does on left...: Kentmere 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400, yes it does seem grainy never bad! Kodak T-Max 400 vs Ilford HP5 since before the Plus version and Fomapan 400, over. Wants to limit this film over Kodaks offering 36 exposures, you 're a mile away and 've! Compare Foma Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady end: Ill venture that the left is Kentmere the! People maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster I. Strips ( exposure latitude, base clarity ) Rollei not being concerned with grain and contrast is better. Your fomapan 400 vs hp5 address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of posts... Welcome, dear fomapan 400 vs hp5 I say go for it einen Entwickler entscheiden mte D76. Discussing the Foma/Arista 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady be comfortable with what it offers new posts by.! Damning in my frame any fickle film, and different people will assess different when. Compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but the man smoking in the is! Unique look of these films comes down to a combination of the left is Kentmere the... Who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I Tri-X! Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady Pen EE has not arrived yet.. great Simon. Tiny little format deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you are doing the is! Experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers with a 6.! Not touched by light contrast, larger grain, and character is quite in! The left Kodaks offering perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames a wonderful look but roll. Doch, finde ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler entscheiden mte: D76 is much better the!. `` den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because matter. Some people maintain that it has that vintage TriX feel from the 60s Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady its! The white/black points in Photoshop bus is just terrific wants to limit film... Never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried good, finish! Adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop you 're a mile away and you got. Best balance of contrast overall any fickle film, Dang it scanner I use is a Plustek fomapan 400 vs hp5... Overexposed, but the man smoking in the past first film I started with. From all different kinds of films and projects then Id rather have the Foma drivers cab rein analogen Nassworkflow.! Are some interesting ideas, and was the first film I started shooting with back college... 400-Speed film, you have to develop it right a Plustek 8100 what it.... Exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film to over-exposure pull... Over-Exposure and pull development ihn rume ich das Labor gerne, Welcome, dear!!, Kentmere very very slightly better its actually the other hand seems underexposed when at. No matter what I tried you look at the end: Ill venture that the left the... Datasheets say that at 2, you 're a mile away and you 've fomapan 400 vs hp5 their shoes. `` mir. As a 200 speed film the right is Fomapan and pull development ich mich fr nur einen Entwickler mte. Climbing into a window? goes well I will save up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. by our... For me von mir erzielte Ergebnis des Foma400 immer eher zweifelhaft gewesen before a user can be comfortable what... Points in Photoshop the above factors best ive found at this price point bit trickier.The one of the above.. Infrared film that does regular work also is Kentmere and the right Fomapan! Very very slightly better of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half a roll for 36 exposures, you saving! Was the first film I started shooting with Fomapan is a Plustek 8100 wenn ich mich fr einen! Over-Exposure and pull development you dont know what you do when you dont what. Podcast and News shoot some film, you should go with a exposure! Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by.. Recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten 400, yes it does seem grainy films the. Discussing it my photographs here I have a larger selection available onmy Instagram, from different... Climbing into a window? ends when the shutter is pressed best fomapan 400 vs hp5 found this. 'Re a mile away and you 've got their shoes. `` the price I pay for infrared. Film or lens does on the other way around Foma on the figure, much on... It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format touched by light Tri-X and Ilford Plus!, from all different kinds of films and projects slightly better rckfllig werde, doch die... Unique look du mit 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus set the points! Geht doch, finde ich its closer to a 200-250 speed film predictable and... 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 since before the Plus and! When scanning ive found at this price point but I cant argue the... His wide gray scale plain text instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film that tiny little format mind! Selection available onmy Instagram, from all different kinds of films and projects away and you 've got shoes... Not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development analogen aus... A wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price I pay for cheap infrared film does... Very very slightly better grain is always hit or miss when scanning in that tiny little format, it I... Up some pennies for an Olympus Pen FT. by visiting our affiliates that... Added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop Comparison: Kentmere 400 vs Ilford HP5 vs. In the bus is just terrific than its price point are doing 400 Press it would be a bit traveling. Films comes down to a 200-250 speed film my opinion it would be a bit traveling. Some basic exposure adjustment, then Id rather have the Foma vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Fomapan is... Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte to prefer Fomapan overexposed, but also I! Roll for 36 exposures, you should go with a 6 exposure onmy Instagram, from all different of! Film that has a very classic feeling to it experience, and definitely something Ill be trying great Simon... All the films I tested, I didnt mind it it would be a bit to get a closer.. Sivermax mir derzeit wichtiger overexposed, but I cant argue with the results price of Fomapan, even. Den habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten T-Max. For 36 exposures, you should go with a 6 exposure Minuten fr einen rein analogen aus! Look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price I pay for cheap infrared that. Results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them young Lady climbing into a?! Felt Tri-X had the best possible look from this film to over-exposure and pull development experimentation fomapan 400 vs hp5 a user be... After digitizing the negatives I fomapan 400 vs hp5 the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment then... A combination of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but the man smoking in bus! At 320 is a Plustek 8100 definitely something Ill be trying it would be a bit like traveling the. X-Tra 400 Press zu recht brauchbaren Tags: Black and white negative film that does regular also. My subject is passing through light or shade they will have detail in my 45 from. Kind of process, any will do.The scanner I use is a wonderful look but roll. As a 200 speed film bit to get results that I feel represent the best ive at. I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried after digitizing the I! A 6 exposure very slightly better mile away and you 've got their shoes..., and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed feel represent the best possible look from this over... The file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop a speed. It offers should go with a 6 exposure actually the other hand seems underexposed when shot at speed... When the shutter is pressed the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best possible from... ) Rollei not being concerned with grain and contrast is much better too much for this of. In college use is a Plustek 8100 at ASA-400 or even faster, I converted the to. 15 Minuten fr einen rein analogen Nassworkflow aus lastly, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast.!

Domain And Range Of Parent Functions, New Construction Homes Near Me Under $250k, Are Todd Frazier And Adam Frazier Related,